Legal Opinion

In re Graves

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided June 27, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.

One of the specifications filed by creditors in opposition to the bankrupt’s discharge, and the only one now in question, is, mutatis mutandis, in the exact language of the statute, viz.: “That being a merchant and tradesman, he has not, subsequently to the passage of the bankrupt act, and its amendments, kept proper books of account.” Rev. St. § 5110. To sustain this allegation evidence was adduced, some being given under objection, tending to show that the bankrupt did not keep his cash-book properly. The learned register to whom it was referred found with the creditors upon this issue. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re GeorgeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1869
  2. In re RathboneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1868
  3. In re AntisdelDistrict Court, D. Michigan · 1878
  4. In re CondictDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1879
  5. In re EidomDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1869

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re GlassDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1902
  2. In re HixonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1899
  3. In re McLaughlinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1933
  4. In re PettisDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API