Watson v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan
This is an appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306 (87 Ill. 2d R. 306) from an order of the trial court granting defendant a new-trial in a negligence action on the sole ground that plaintiff’s counsel used an improper per diem formula in arguing the amount of damages to be awarded for future pain and suffering. The only issue before us is whether the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a new trial.
Plaintiff brought the instant action seeking recovery for personal injuries allegedly sustained when she fell on a sidewalk owned and maintained by defendant. After a trial on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Caley v. ManickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Caley v. ManickeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Franks v. North Shore Farms, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- Warp v. WhitmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barreto v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- McCullough v. Gallaher & SpeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Friedland v. Allis Chalmers Co. of CanadaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Lagoni v. Holiday Inn MidwayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Ramirez v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.