Ramirez v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman
The defendant, City of Chicago, appeals from a $234,227 judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Belen Ramirez, in the instant negligence action. The defendant contends that the trial court erred in directing a verdict on the issue of constructive notice, that it erred in allowing certain medical testimony, and that numerous improper remarks made by the plaintiff’s counsel during closing arguments entitle it to a new trial. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s judgment as to the issue of liability, reverse as to the issue of damages, and remand for a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Caley v. ManickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Balestri v. Terminal Freight Cooperative Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Caley v. ManickeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Warner v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Compton v. UbilluzAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Clarke v. MEDLEY MOVING AND STORAGE, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Rios v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Burns v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
- Burns v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.