Legal Opinion

Doral Hosiery Corporation v. Sav-A-Stop, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1974No. Civ. A. 72-711PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HANNUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Doral Hosiery Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as Doral) brought this action against the defendant, Sav-A-Stop, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as Sav-A-Stop) for damages resulting from breach of contract.

The plaintiff’s Complaint contains two counts. The first count avers that SavA-Stop did not pay the full contract price for merchandise sold and delivered to it by Doral. The second count avers that Sav-A-Stop did not purchase a sufficient quantity of merchandise from Doral to satisfy the terms of the contract.

Presently before the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harry Rubin & Sons, Inc. v. Consolidated Pipe Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Thomas J. Kline, Inc. v. Lorillard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  3. Reigel Fiber Corporation v. Anderson Gin Company, Reibel Fiber Corporation v. Ellis BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. C. R. Fedrick, Inc. v. Borg-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Lorenz Supply Co. v. American Standard, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API