Legal Opinion

State v. T. M. (In re T. M.)

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2019No. A165889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AOYAGI, J., *705Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing her involuntarily to the Oregon Health Authority for up to 180 days. Appellant contends that the trial court erred because the evidence in the record was insufficient to establish that she was dangerous to others due to a mental disorder. See ORS 426.130(1)(a)(C) ; ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A). We agree with appellant and, accordingly, reverse.

Unless we exercise our discretion to review de novo , which we do not in this case, we "view[ ] the evidence, as supplemented and buttressed by permissible derivative inferences, in the light most…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. D. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. E. J. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. J. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. S. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. J. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. J. K.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API