Legal Opinion
PULA
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1987No. ID 3033PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3033 EER OF PULA In Exclusion Proceedings A-26873482 Decided by Board September 22, 7987 (1) An alien's manner of entry or attempted entry is a proper and relevant discre- tionary factor to consider in adjudicating asylum applications. (2) The circumvention of orderly refugee procedures can be a serious adverse factor in determining whether to grant asylum; however, it should not be considered in ouch a way that the practical effect is to deny relief in all cases. (3) The circumvention of the immigration laws is only one of a number of factors which should be balanced in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1985
- MOGARRABIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1987
- SALIMBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- BURBANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1994
- Andriasian v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Vaso and Djela Perkovic v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- CHENBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
- S-M-JBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.