Legal Opinion

Hamann v. Stickle

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1934No. 6425Published

1Opinion of the Court

NEVIN, District Judge.

On December 91,1930, Mrs. C. A. Hamann filed her application in the District Court praying for an order of eourt directing the receiver for James Hoyt et al., who prior to October, 9’, 1930, conducted a brokerage and trading business under the firm name of Prince & Whitely, with offices in Cleveland, Ohio, to deliver to her the sum of $5,882.50; with interest, out of the assets.of the firm of Prince & Whitely, in his hands as receiver, without prejudice, however, to any and all rights which she might have to the delivery of certain shares of stock and/or cash from any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Walter J. Schmidt & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  2. In re BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  3. In re A. O. Brown & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API