Legal Opinion

In re A. O. Brown & Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 16, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In the matter of A. O. Brown & Co., bankrupts. Ex parte Allen R. Smart. Order in favor of claimant.

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, District Judge.

[1] This cause now comes back upon a separate report of the master. The claimant’s position is this: When a customer gives money to a broker to invest, the broker holds it in trust until he has received the securities in which he is to invest it. No mere contract of purchase satisfies the condition upon which he may be permitted to appropriate it, but only the delivery to the broker of the securities. Admitting under Re Brown, Ex parte Herrocks, 185 Fed. 766 (decided November 14, 1910), that the presumption is that a contract of purchase on a stock exchange is represented…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  2. In re T. A. McIntyre & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  3. In re BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Barrett Herrick & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Hamann v. StickleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API