Legal Opinion
In re Walter J. Schmidt & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 12, 1923PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Lincoln Trust Company Bank Deposit.
LEARNED HAND, District Judge.
For various reasons not necessary to state the petitioners Schrader, Bonynge, and Salmond all have claims against the bank deposit in the Lincoln Trust Company, which the receiver recognzes as entitling them collectively to the whole of it as a trust fund. The only question is how it shall be divided between them. The special master upheld the claims of Cole, Bonynge, and Schrader, and divided the fund, under the authority of Empire, etc., Co. v. Carroll County, 194 Fed. 593, 114 C. C. A. 435, on the principle that the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Gorman v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hewitt v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- People v. . MeadowsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lowden v. Northwestern Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Beatrice R. Ruddle v. Luke C. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- McHale v. Boulder Capital LLC (In Re 1031 Tax Group, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. FranklinDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986
- Distral Energy Corp. v. Michigan Boiler & Engineering Co. (In Re Michigan Boiler & Engineering Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.