Legal Opinion

Shinkle v. Louisville & N. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio

Decided July 30, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Shinkle, Wilson & Kreis Oo. and others obtained a preliminary injunction against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company,' without notice to it, compelling it to obey an order of the interstate commerce commission. Subsequent to the granting of the order defendant filed an answer putting in issue the material facts alleged in the petition. Defendant moves to discharge the order. Order dissolved.

1Opinion of the Court

LURTON, Circuit Judge.

The only matter now for consideration is as to the continuance of a restraining order granted without notice to the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, upon a petition filed by a number of manufacturers and merchants of Cincinnati, in behalf of themselves and all other shippers in like situation, to obtain such injunctions or other process as will compel the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company to obey an order made by the interstate commerce commission in reference to freight rates on merchandise and manufactures shipped from Cincinnati to a number of junction…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kentucky & I. Bridge Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1889
  2. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & O. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1890
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1892
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Lehigh Val. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. Western New York & P. R. Co. v. Penn Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  3. Mayor of Knoxville v. AfricaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  4. Detroit, G. H. & M. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API