Legal Opinion

McDonough v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1904No. 3013PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of perjury, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of three years.

It is only necessary to consider one assignment of error, which questions the action of the court refusing to quash the indictment. The indictment shows that the alleged perjury was committed on the trial in the district court in a certain case, wherein appellant was plaintiff and the Gulf, Colorado and Santa Fe Railway Company was defendant, the pamp being for damages occasioned by alleged personal injuries sustained while plaintiff was in the employ…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McMurtry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Higgins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Meeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Harden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Timmins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. State v. DallagiovannaWashington Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API