Legal Opinion

McMurtry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 12, 1898No. 1434PublishedCited by 33 opinions

The opinion sets out the essential allegations of the indictment as well as the grounds upon which the motion to quash the same was based. Ho further statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of perjury, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of two years; hence this appeal.

As appellant made a motion to quash the indictment, we will set out such parts thereof as are necessary to a discussion of the questions raised on said motion. The perjury, as set out in the indictment, is predicated upon the alleged false testimony of W. A. McMurtry before the grand jury of Clay County, Texas, at its March term, 1897. The indictment charges that J. D. Stine was the foreman of said grand jury, and administered the oath…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Shuman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Buller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Stansbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Compton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Hardin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Fifer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API