Legal Opinion
People v. Bordowitz
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided June 25, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*129OPINION OF THE COURT
Laura E. Drager, J.
Defendants were each charged with one count of criminally possessing a hypodermic instrument (Penal Law § 220.45). After a nonjury trial, this court reserved decision on its verdict.
At trial, the People presented evidence (by stipulation) that on March 6, 1990 at approximately 12:10 p.m. each defendant knowingly possessed hypodermic instruments and that no defendant had a prescription or any personal medical reason for possession of the needles.
It was further stipulated that Captain Frey of the Midtown South Task Force and several dozen officers were at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. DianaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State v. DorseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. TateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- City of St. Louis v. KlockerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. BachmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MonroeCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
- People v. MooreCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1996
- State v. McCagueNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1998
- People v. Cromwell (James)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.