Legal Opinion

State v. Bachman

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1979No. 6392PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was convicted of the offense of violating HRS § 712-1249, which provides:

“(1) A person commits the offense of promoting a detrimental drug in the third degree if he knowingly possesses any marijuana or any Schedule V substance in any amount.
“(2) Promoting a detrimental drug in the third degree is a petty misdemeanor.”

On appeal the defendant asserts the unconstitutionality of the statute. We find this contention to be without merit. What we said in State v. Baker, 56 Haw. 271, 535 P.2d 1394 (1975), and State v. Renfro, 56 Haw. 501, 542 P.2d 366 (1975), is still determinative of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. HornHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. BakerHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. RenfroHawaii Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. MallanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. United States v. Cannabis Cultivators ClubDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
  3. State v. KealohaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. BordowitzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991
  5. State v. BonjourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API