Legal Opinion
State v. Bachman
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1979No. 6392PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant was convicted of the offense of violating HRS § 712-1249, which provides:
“(1) A person commits the offense of promoting a detrimental drug in the third degree if he knowingly possesses any marijuana or any Schedule V substance in any amount.
“(2) Promoting a detrimental drug in the third degree is a petty misdemeanor.”
On appeal the defendant asserts the unconstitutionality of the statute. We find this contention to be without merit. What we said in State v. Baker, 56 Haw. 271, 535 P.2d 1394 (1975), and State v. Renfro, 56 Haw. 501, 542 P.2d 366 (1975), is still determinative of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HornHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. BakerHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. RenfroHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. MallanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- United States v. Cannabis Cultivators ClubDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1998
- State v. KealohaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. BordowitzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991
- State v. BonjourSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.