City of St. Louis v. Klocker
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Judge.
Plaintiff, the City of St. Louis, charged defendants with trespass, a violation of § 795.010, Revised Code of the City of St. Louis. After trial to the court without a jury, defendants were convicted and fined $50.00 each.1 On appeal, the sole issue is whether the trial court erred in granting plaintiffs motion in limine to exclude defendants’ evidence in support of the defense of necessity. We find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*175In this cause, the facts are undisputed. On the morning of April 5,1980, defendants went to the offices of Reproductive Health…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. LovercampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Townsend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Cleveland v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. KrizkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- State v. ClowesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Buckley v. City of Falls ChurchCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
- State v. O'BRIENMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- City of Cape Girardeau v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.