Legal Opinion
Pinto v. Internationale Set, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 20, 1986No. Civil 4-86-60PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Irving Pinto, Barry Gussoff, and Charles Polin brought this action for damages against their former employer, Internationale Set, alleging intentional interference with business and contractual relationships, defamation, and “trade libel.” Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. The matter is now before this court on defendant’s motions for judgment on the pleadings or transfer to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Background
Plaintiffs were sales representatives for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Roger Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Lerette v. Dean Witter Organization, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Andre Pope v. Esa Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Gurman v. Metro Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Magee v. Trustees of Hamline UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- MSK EyEs Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Thompson v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.