Legal Opinion

McNeill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 1930No. A-7186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of having in his possession a whisky still for the unlawful purpose of manufacturing whisky and distilled spirits, and sentenced to pay a fine of f 100 and be imprisoned in the county jail for thirty days. Prom the sentence and judgment the defendant has appealed to this court.

The testimony on behalf of the state tends to show that the officers were out in the neighborhood of defendant’s home and, after they had searched the place of a man by the name of Thornton, went over on defendant’s place about a quarter of a mile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Merck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API