Legal Opinion
Jackson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 6, 1923No. A-3820PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatson, J.
(after stating the facts as above). First, it is contended that this) prosecution must fail because the act of the Legislature upon which it is based is in violation of section 57, art. 5, of the Constitution. Said section is as follows:
“Every act of the Legislature shall embrace but one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title, except general appropriation bills, general revenue bills, and bills adopting a code, digest, or revision of statutes; and no law shall be revived, amended, or the provisions thereof extended or conferred,, by reference to its title only; but so much…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Isenhour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re PowellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Newcomb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Grissom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Riley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.