Hamama v. Adducci
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER REGARDING JURISDICTION
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge . ,
This case pits the power of Congress to control the jurisdiction of the federal courts against the Constitution’s command that the writ of habeas corpus must be preserved. Both sides in this clash are right, in part. The Government is correct that Congress meant to strip federal district courts of jurisdiction to entertain the kind of habeas claims that Petitioners assert here challenging their repatriation to Iraq, But Petitioners are correct that extraordinary circumstances exist that will likely render…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Devitri v. CronenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Hamama v. AdducciDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Rodriguez-Guardado v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Majano Garcia v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2018
- Alam v. NielsenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.