Legal Opinion

Hamama v. Adducci

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 24, 2017No. Case No. 17-cv-11910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER GRANTING PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. 77)

■ MARK A. GOLDSMITH, United States District Judge

In their motion for a preliminary injunction, Petitioners ask this Court to halt temporarily their deportation to Iraq, until they can make their case in the immigration courts that their removal is legally prohibited. The grounds that they will urge in those courts and, if necessary, in the federal. courts of appeals .will be that returning them to the lawlessness and senseless religious hatred that engulfs much of Iraq would subject them to persecution, torture,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Devitri v. CronenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  2. Chhoeun v. MarinDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018
  3. Rodriguez-Guardado v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
  4. Hamama v. AdducciDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
  5. Hamama v. AdducciDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API