Legal Opinion

Porto v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1936No. Appeal, 226PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

The question in this workmen’s compensation case is whether the court below erred in reversing the action of the board in dismissing claimant’s petition for rehearing.

Claimant suffered an accidental injury to his left foot on March 23, 1931, while in the employ of defendant. On April 11, 1931, a compensation agreement was executed by claimant and defendant, which provided for compensation for indeterminate total disability. On August 21, 1933, defendant, after paying compensation for 125 weeks, filed a petition to modify the agreement, in which it alleged that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gairt v. Curry Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Fedak v. DzialdowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Barton v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Garvin v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Marinho v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Petrovan v. Rockhill Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Newancavitch v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Artac v. Union Collieries Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Harris v. No. 1 Contracting Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Harrison v. Alden Park Manor ApartmentsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API