Legal Opinion

Auto Security Co. v. Mickens

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1923No. Appeal, No. 183PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 183, Oct. T., 1922, by Harry Chervin, intervening defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1920, No. 1941, for plaintiff, non obstante veredicto, on verdict for intervening defendant in the case of Auto Security Company v. Clarence C. Mickens and Hardy J. Green, defendants, and Harry Chervin, individually, and trading as Cayuga Garage and Repair Shop, intervening defendant. Replevin to recover possession of an automobile.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 183, Oct. T., 1922, by Harry Chervin, intervening defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1920, No. 1941, for plaintiff, non obstante veredicto, on verdict for intervening defendant in the case of Auto Security Company v. Clarence C. Mickens and Hardy J. Green, defendants, and Harry Chervin, individually, and trading as Cayuga Garage and Repair Shop, intervening defendant. Replevin to recover possession of an automobile. Before Ferguson, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict for the intervening defendant in the sum of $500.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

The plaintiff, the Auto Security Company, issued a writ of replevin against Mickens and Green to recover possession of an automobile, which it had leased to them. When the sheriff took possession, he found the car in the shop of Harry Chervin, intervening defendant. Chervin had made repairs to the automobile and claimed a lien for the same. He states that before such repairs were made, he had received authority to do so from the Auto Security Company .through its president. The jury found in favor of the intervening defendant for the amount of his claim, but the court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Meyers v. BratespieceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Engle v. Capital Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Duroth Manufacturing Co. v. CauffielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Bankers' Commercial Security Co. v. BrennanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Stern v. SicaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garreth v. Ford, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1957
  2. Greenberg v. Mowrer, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1948
  3. Parrish & Co. v. Bacon, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API