Parrish & Co. v. Bacon

Williams, J.,

And now, this 22nd day of May, 1925, upon due and full consideration of all the questions of law raised in the affidavit of defence, after listening to the oral arguments made by counsel for both the plaintiffs and the defendant and reading the brief submitted by counsel for the plaintiffs — no statement of the points in controversy or brief of authorities having been submitted, as required by Rule 25, on the part of counsel for the defendant (see Hoopes Brothers and Thomas Co. v. McMenamin, 39 Montg. Co. Law Repr. 309 (1923), page 310; and Com. v. Symington, 41 Montg. Co. Law…