Legal Opinion

Leimann v. Board of Adjustment, Cranford Tp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 5, 1952PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

William J. Brennan, Jr., J.

Determining that “by reason of the exceptional and peculiar shape of the premises and by reason of non-access to the rear of said premises,” the strict application of the municipal zoning ordinance would result in undue hardship upon defendant owners, the Board' of Adjustment of the Township of Cranford granted a variance permitting the construction of a garden-type apartment project of eight buildings with 140 residential units upon 9y2 acres of unimproved land in a district classified as Residence A limited to single-family…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Price v. Himeji, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  2. Baker v. ConnellSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  3. Commercial Realty & Resources Corp. v. First Atlantic Properties Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Ten Stary Dom Partnership v. T. Brent Mauro (069079)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  5. Orleans Builders & Developers v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API