Legal Opinion

Baker v. Connell

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 22, 1985PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

Frances D. Baker appeals the Superior Court’s reversal of a variance granted her by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Rehoboth Beach (the Board) to build two townhouses on certain beach front land zoned as open space. The Superior Court ruled in favor of the appellee, Lawrence J. Connell, an adjoining landowner, on the ground that the record did not support the Board’s finding that the open space zoning of the parcel made it unique. Thus, there was no unnecessary hardship, peculiar to this property, upon which to base a variance. We agree and affirm.

I

The land is a corner…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. Pollard v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Searles v. DarlingSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
  4. In Re the Application of Emmett S. Hickman Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1954
  5. Leimann v. Board of Adjustment, Cranford Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Stoltz Management Co. v. Consumer Affairs BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Public Water Supply Co. v. DiPasqualeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. Cromwell v. WardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. CCS INVESTORS, LLC v. BrownSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. Hicklin v. Onyx Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API