Legal Opinion
Great West Casualty Co. v. Kroning
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 18, 1994No. C7-93-1419PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Appellants challenge the district court’s determination that nursing services rendered by Theogene Kroning to her husband are not compensable by a no-fault carrier. By notice of review, respondent challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to vacate an arbitrator’s award. We affirm.
FACTS
On November 29, 1991, Ronald Kroning was driving a truck for his employer, St. Charles Transport. The roads were icy, and traffic was moving slowly. According to Ronald Kroning, a red car passed him, then suddenly cut in front of him and braked. When he braked to avoid hitting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Safeco Insurance Co. v. GoldenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Woog v. Home Mutual Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- AMCO Insurance v. Ashwood-AmesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995