Legal Opinion

Government of the Virgin Islands v. James Civil and Cymandy James

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 26, 1979No. 78-1350 and 78-1351PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WEIS, Circuit Judge

A Virgin Islands statute repealed after defendants’ trial required that accomplice testimony be corroborated before conviction could be had. Concluding that the repealed statute is applicable to crimes committed before its revocation, and finding no corroboration against one defendant, we vacate his conviction. We also hold that a coconspirator is an accomplice within the meaning of the statute and because the trial court’s charge was at odds with that construction, we order a new trial on the conspiracy count against the other defendant.

Defendants Civil…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Paul J. Leahy United States of America v. Timothy Smith United States of America v. Dantone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. State v. SchreuderUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. ByersIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. Johnny G.California Supreme Court · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API