Legal Opinion
Minneapolis, Northfield & Southern Railway, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1983No. 82-1317PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
A provision of the Revised Interstate Commerce Act, added by the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, permits a rail carrier to cancel the application of certain joint rates,1 in the absence of a statutorily prescribed demonstration by another participating carrier, “notwithstanding any other provision of this title, any prior agreement in effect on the effective date of the [statute], or any requirement of the Commission.” 49 U.S.C. § 10705a(c)(l). Pursuant to this provision, intervenor Chicago and North Western Transportation Company (CNW) filed supplemental tariffs…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minneapolis, Northfield And Southern Railway, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983