Legal Opinion
Baker v. Surman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 22, 1985No. C1-84-1022PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
James and Monica Baker purchased a home from Robert and Judith Surman which later proved to have a leaky roof and basement. They sued Surmans for breach of warranty, the realty companies and realtors involved for misrepresentation, and a Federal Housing Administration (FHA) appraiser for negligence. The trial court directed verdicts against Bakers in favor of the realty companies, the realtors and the appraiser. It awarded them a judgment of $5,000 against Surmans. Bakers appeal the directed verdicts and the amount of the judgment against Surmans. We affirm in part,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. PerranoskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Parkside Mobile Estates v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Anders v. Dakota Land & Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schaaf v. HighfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Sadtler v. Jackson-Cross Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Dain Bosworth Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Emmons v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Fuller v. Banknorth Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.