Legal Opinion

Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 5, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0106PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOWNIE, Judge.

¶ 1 This ease involves interpretation of Rule 17(a) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”). We hold that plaintiffs/appellants should have been allowed to join or substitute the bankruptcy trustee as the real party in interest, without establishing that the proper party plaintiff was difficult to determine or that they made an “understandable mistake” by not naming the trustee in the first instance. Because the superior court concluded otherwise, we reverse its order of dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 In October 2005,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Advanced Magnetics, Inc. v. Bayfront Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. Morton v. GTE Southwest Inc. (Wieburg)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. Beal v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Beal for Martinez v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Fisk v. HurricaneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. Rzendzian v. M&I MarshallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API