Legal Opinion
Transmission Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 20, 2007No. 05-1402, 06-1246PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners challenge three orders 1 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) that require the City of Vernon, California (‘Vernon”) to issue refunds to the California Independent System Operator Corporation (“CAISO”) for overcollection of its transmission revenue requirement (“TRR”). 2 Any opinion whose opening sentence includes three acronyms, one footnote that refers to three FERC orders and another that requires a definition of an accounting procedure is likely to be about a matter of some…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Central Iowa Power Cooperative v. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Richard Dominguez v. Ual CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Northwest Requirements Utilities v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Albany Engineering Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.