Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Saladino

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 2008No. B201326PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHMANN-GERST, J.

Mark J. Saladino, a public administrator for the County of Los Angeles (the Public Administrator), challenges a probate court order appointing respondent Elke Harrington (Harrington) administrator of the estate of Johanna A. Heath (the decedent). The Public Administrator contends that Harrington did not “succeed” to a portion of the decedent’s estate, as required by Probate Code section 8462, subdivision (a),1 by virtue *399of her mother’s assignment of a portion of her interest in the estate to Harrington. Rather, succession occurs only by operation of law.

We agree with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Barner v. LeedsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. MasbruchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of HeathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API