People v. Masbruch
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
We here determine the applicability of enhancements under Penal Code section 12022.3, subdivision (a) (§ 12022.3(a)),1 for “use[]” of a firearm “in the commission of’ a crime, to sex offenses that a defendant commits after initially displaying a firearm. This issue has divided the Courts of Appeal. We conclude that the Court of Appeal here properly found that defendant used a firearm in the commission of rape and sodomy. We therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
I. Facts and Procedural Background
Mary K. and her mother, Marietta K., lived in an apartment complex in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. FierroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. Hajek and VoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.