Rhodes v. Hilligoss
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The only question presented on this appeal is whether or not it is necessary to the statement of a cause of action, in a suit commenced .by a receiver upon an obligation due the corporation for which he is acting, that it be alleged that leave of court to institute and prosecute the action was obtained before suit was commenced.
Section 1242, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (1228, Horner’s R. S. 1896), provides that: “the receiver shall have power, under control of the court, or of the judge thereof in vacation, to bring and defend actions, to take and keep possession of the property, to receive rents,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co. v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Pennsylvania Co. v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Ryan v. HurleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- New Kentucky Coal Co. v. AlbaniIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Western Assurance Co. v. McCartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Smith v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Pape v. KaoughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Rau v. Ball Bros. Glass Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898