Legal Opinion

Smith v. Miller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1898No. 2,530PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

This action was brought by appellees as creditors of Thomas B. Robertson, deceased, whose claims had been allowed but had not been paid, asking that the final settlement made by the administrator of said estate be set aside, and the estate reopened. The petition was based upon section 2558, Burns’ R. S. 1894 (2403, Horner’s R. S. 1897), which reads as follows: “When final settlement of an estate shall have been made, and the executor or administrator discharged, any person interested in the estate, not appearing at the final settlement, nor personally summoned to attend the same, may have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. CaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Western Assurance Co. v. McCartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. American Insurance v. ReplogleIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Dill v. MumfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Western Assurance Co. v. KoontzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Euler v. EulerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Utterback v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Heitman, Rec. v. ScalesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API