Legal Opinion

Pape v. Kaough

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1899No. 2,933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From the Allen. Superior Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Henley, J. —

This action was commenced by appellant against appellee to recover for goods sold and for work and labor done. Appellee answered in four paragraphs. Appellant’s demurrer was overruled to the first and second paragraphs of answer and sustained as to the third and fourth. Appellee also filed a cross-complaint. Appellant’s demurrer to the cross-complaint was overruled. There was a trial by jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee upon his cross-complaint. The first specification of the assignment of errors questions the action of the lower court in overruling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. HoldermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Dill v. MumfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Supreme Council of the Catholic Benevolent Legion v. BoyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Spencer v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Fee v. State ex rel. PleasantIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. WalshIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API