North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The respondent, the Industrial Accident Commission of the state of California, assumed jurisdiction and made its award in the ease of a seaman in the employ of the petitioner, who was injured while his vessel, owned by citizens of this state, was upon the high seas. Application for a writ of review was granted by this court. This application was based upon the contentions that the United States district courts, under their admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, were alone empowered to deal with the question, and that the Industrial Compensation Act of California, [Stats. 1913, p. 279], in so…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Leszczymski v. Andrew Radel Oyster Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Rodriguez v. Union Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Madruga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.