Legal Opinion

Madruga v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1952No. L. A. 22511PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Coowners representing 85 per cent of the interest in the Oil Screw Vessel Liberty, Official No. 256,332, docked at the city of San Diego, filed in the superior court in San Diego County a complaint for partition by sale of the vessel and distribution of the proceeds to all the coowners. Manuel S. Madruga, the owner of the remaining 15 per cent interest, named as defendant in the complaint, filed a demurrer stating among other grounds that the superior court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter and that exclusive jurisdiction was in the federal court. The respondent court overruled the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jordine v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Higgins v. EvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. United States of Mexico v. RaskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Fischer v. CareyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Madruga v. Superior Court of Cal., County of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Sun Harbor Marina, Inc. v. SellickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Madruga v. Superior Court of Cal., County of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API