Legal Opinion

Klingel's Pharmacy v. Sharp & Dohme

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 5, 1906PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeál from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Stock-bridge, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.

The question now before us is merely one of pleading and involves only the sufficiency of the averments of the declaration. To the declaration the defendants demurred and the Superior Court of Baltimore City sustained the demurrer and entered judgment for the defendants for costs, and from that judgment this appeal was taken. In order to determine whether the ruling of the Superior Court was correct it will be necessary to set forth with some fullness the allegations of the declaration; and the objections which have been urged against its legal sufficiency will then be stated and considered.

Th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. HollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Kimball v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  4. Robertson v. ParksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  5. Erdman v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Alexander & Alexander Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Natural Design, Inc. v. Rouse Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. MacKlin v. Robert Logan AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API