Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Mobarak

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1973No. Docket 14832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

The problem presented by this appeal is to reconcile, if possible, the literal wording of art 10, §2 of the 1963 Michigan Constitution and the statute which furnishes the procedural implementation of the constitutional provision.

It is axiomatic that our duty is to arrive at a constitutional conclusion, if possible.

The involved constitutional provision reads:

"Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation therefor being first made or secured in a manner prescribed by law. Compensation shall be determined in proceedings in a court of record.” (Emphasis supplied.)

We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DowSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. In Re Urban Renewal, Elmwood Park ProjectMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Highway Commission v. DavisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. 1,060.92 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. CronenwettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Gargagliano v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Gargagliano v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Fairfax Family Fund, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API