Gargagliano v. Secretary of State
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentO’Hara, J.
This opinion was assigned to Judge Kaufman for the preparation of the Court’s opinion. I accept in its entirety his recitation of facts and his statement of the procedural sequence in this case.
I further agree with my colleague that the constitutional guarantee of due process requires that *21plaintiff be afforded the opportunity for a hearing at which she can raise whatever arguments or defenses she chooses in response to the Secretary of State’s decision to suspend her driving privileges.
I am, however, unable to agree with his conclusion as to the unconstitutionality of MCLA 257.303a; MSA…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.