State v. Warren
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Smith. It did not appear from the transcript what Judge presided at the trial of this causo in the Court below. The facts are stated in the Opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
In this, and the several other cases submitted with it, (1080, 1081, 1082,1083, 1084 and 1085,) the Court proceeded to set aside the judgment of forfeiture, and discharge the defendants absolutely from their recognizance, expressly on the ground, that the appearance of the defendants at a subsequent Term of the Court, after having broken their recognizance, was “ a satisfaction of their appearance bond, and an answer to the scirefacias, except as to the costs of the scire faciasThe consequence is, that the defendant is not bound to appear at the Term of the Court at which his appear-' anee is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. StagerNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- United States v. FeelyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1813
3Cited by7 opinions
- Makeig v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
- United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
- State v. CliffordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Bonds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.