Legal Opinion

State v. Clifford

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 5, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court.—Hon. H. L. Edmunds, Judge. (1) It was error to refuse a trial by jury. Const. Mo., art. 2, secs. 28, 30; R. S. 1889, sec. 2131; State v. Posey, 70 Ala. 45; State v. Chandler, 79 Me. 172; State v. Kinne, 41 N. H. 238; State v. Woerner, 33,Mo. 216; Milsap v. Wildman, 5 Mo. 425; Brown v. Railroad, 37 Mo. 299; Ihmphrey v. Lundy, 37 Mo. 323. (2) The compromise and settlement made with the respondent’s agent and attorney, and with the consent…

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court.—Hon. H. L. Edmunds, Judge. (1) It was error to refuse a trial by jury. Const. Mo., art. 2, secs. 28, 30; R. S. 1889, sec. 2131; State v. Posey, 70 Ala. 45; State v. Chandler, 79 Me. 172; State v. Kinne, 41 N. H. 238; State v. Woerner, 33,Mo. 216; Milsap v. Wildman, 5 Mo. 425; Brown v. Railroad, 37 Mo. 299; Ihmphrey v. Lundy, 37 Mo. 323. (2) The compromise and settlement made with the respondent’s agent and attorney, and with the consent and approval of the court, constituted a bar fco further prosecution of the forfeiture. Weeks’ on Attorneys, secs. 228…

1Opinion of the CourtCantt, P. J.

On the seventh day of October, 1891, one G-. W. Clifford, in the St. Louis court of criminal correction, entered into his recognizance to the state of Missouri, with the defendant Hoeffner as his ' security for his appearance before the St. Louis criminal court, at the next regular term thereof, to answer to a charge of felony, and that he should not depart without leave. Clifford failed to appear according to the condition of his recognizance, and on the second day of December, 1891, judgment of forfeiture was rendered against them on said recognizance.

On the ninth day of February, 1893, a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. M'Crea v. BartlettNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. United States v. FeelyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1813
  3. Black v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  4. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  5. Spears v. LedergerberSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rodes v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. State ex rel. Board of Education v. NastSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
  4. Reorganized School District No. 7 v. DouthitSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  5. City of St. Louis v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API