Bladow v. Bladow
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Cheryl Bladow is appealing an East Central Judicial District Court judgment granting Bruce Bladow an equal distribution of the marital estate. Cheryl Bladow argues the district court erred in dividing the marital estate in half, because the majority of the parties’ total estate consists of her personal injury settlement. She argues the district court’s findings of fact, taken as a whole, were clearly erroneous and led to an inequitable distribution of the parties’ property. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
[¶ 2] The parties were married in Fargo, North…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fischer v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Ruff v. RuffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952
- Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Grinaker v. GrinakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Kostelecky v. KosteleckyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Ulsaker v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Hitz v. HitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Amsbaugh v. AmsbaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Wagner v. WagnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.