Legal Opinion

Miller v. Meister & Segrist

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1998No. S-98-050PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Appellee Jim Miller originally brought this action against appellee Meister & Segrist, his employer, for workers’ compensation benefits. Appellant, GRE Insurance Group (GRE), Meister & Segrist’s insurer, then brought an action as a third-party plaintiff against appellee State of Nebraska, Second Injury Fund (Fund) as a third-party defendant. In its third-party petition against the Fund, GRE argued that the Fund was liable for part of Miller’s injuries even though Miller’s injuries were not classified as permanent. Thus, the instant case presents the question, Can the Fund be liable to an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Hull v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. POPPLE BY POPPLE v. RoseNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Mulder v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Behrens v. American Stores Packing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Central States Foundation v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Miller v. E.M.C. Insurance CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Maroulakos v. Walmart Assocs., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Maroulakos v. Walmart AssociatesNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API