POPPLE BY POPPLE v. Rose
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C.J.
This case raises the issue of whether the parents of a minor child have a duty to warn third parties of the child’s allegedly known dangerous sexual propensities. We removed this case, pursuant to our power to regulate the Nebraska Court of Appeals’ caseload and that of this court, to determine whether a parental duty to warn exists in the State of Nebraska. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106 (Reissue 1995).
In September 1992, Brian Popple and Maureen Popple hired W.R. to care for their children, Casey and Nicholas. On November 23, while babysitting the children, W.R. physically overpowered Casey…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Preston v. DuncanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Aw v. Lancaster County School Dist. 0001Nebraska Supreme Court · 2010
- Doe v. ZedekNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Knoll v. Board of Regents of University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Diane Packard v. Falls City Area JayceesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.