Legal Opinion

Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 2, 1957No. Term No. 57-M-5PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE BARDENS

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a $75,000 judgment rendered on a jury’s verdict in the City Court of East St. Louis in a personal injury action under the F. E. L. A., 45 U. S. C. A. See. 51 et seq., and the Federal Safety Appliance Act. The trial court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the action on the doctrine of forum non conveniens. This ruling together with alleged errors in the trial form the basis of defendant’s appeal.

Plaintiff, a resident of Kentucky, was injured while releasing the brakes on a freight car in defendant’s yards in Covington,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pope v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Bowman v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Pennell v. Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  4. Peterie v. ThompsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API