Legal Opinion

Schwartz, Admx. v. Badila

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1938No. 26781 and 26782PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question of first importance in these cases is the validity of the ordinance introduced in evidence and the correctness of the instruction to the jury based thereon.

By the provisions of Section 3, Article XVIII, of the state Constitution, authority is conferred upon municipalities to adopt and enforce within their limits such police, sanitary and other similar regulations as are not in conflict with general laws. The power thus conferred by the Constitution cannot be denied or abridged by statute. City of Fremont v. Keating, 96 Ohio St., 468, 118 N. E., 114. The police power conferred,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Swoboda v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Schneiderman v. SesansteinOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. GoldmanOhio Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ChaseOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Book v. Erskine & Sons, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State Ex Rel. Strain v. HoustonOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Shapiro v. ButtsOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  5. City of Cleveland v. IsaacsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API