Legal Opinion

Cleveland Ry. Co. v. Goldman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1930No. 21855PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This action was begun in the municipal court of the city of Cleveland by Florence G-oldman, a minor, etc., against the Cleveland Railway Company. The plaintiff recovered a judgment, which judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. The parties will be referred to here in the relation they occupied in the municipal court.

The plaintiff, in her statement of claim, alleged that she received her injury when she was crossing Euclid avenue at its intersection with East Twelfth street; that proceeding from the northwest corner, she was crossing from the northerly side of Euclid avenue to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schell v. DuBoisOhio Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Snyder v. StanfordOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. ChaseOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Industrial Commission v. RipkeOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Welch v. Canton City Lines, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Schwartz, Admx. v. BadilaOhio Supreme Court · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API