Legal Opinion

Leeds v. Leeds

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1945No. 28,112PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, C. J.

The rights of the parties to this appeal are controlled by a deed executed March 11, 1878, wherein William T. Pate and his wife did “as advancement, convey and warrant to Fannie Pate, daughter of the grantors . . . during her natural life, and then to the children of her body that may survive her” certain real estate in Dearborn County. After the description the deed continues: “In case of the death of the said Fannie Pate without leaving any children, the above described real estate shall revert back to the grantors herein.”

Afterwards Fannie Pate married Frank J. Leeds by whom she had three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hackleman v. HacklemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Rouse v. PaidrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Schofield v. GreenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. Railroad School Township v. ChristensenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Robertson v. GuentherIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ross, Inc. v. LeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BeiselIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. ITT Industrial Credit Co. v. R.T.M. Development Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Collins v. HeldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Richardson v. CHASTAIN, ADMX., ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API